Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Smith v. Maloney et al
as 1:2017cv01475
Plaintiff:
Adam C Smith
Defendant:
Corey Maloney, Kurt Bode, Robert C Bollinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamilton v. Vermilion County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv02238
Plaintiff:
Carroll E Hamilton
Defendant:
Vermilion County Jail, Medical Department Supervisor, Pat Hartshorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goston v. Carroll et al
as 1:2017cv07417
Plaintiff:
James A. Goston
Defendant:
John P. Carroll, Kathleen Weck, Glenn Sroka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Clarke et al
as 2:2017cv00997
Plaintiff:
Marcelus Edward Goodwin
Defendant:
David Clarke , Captain Souck, Captain Dukard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll, Jermichael v. Chapman et al
as 3:2017cv00137
Plaintiff:
Jermichael Carroll
Defendant:
Chapman , Royce, Lindsy Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sustaita v. State of Illinois et al
as 2:2017cv02002
Plaintiff:
Antonio Sustaita
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Lisa Madigan, Michelle Buscher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ARTHUR v. CITY OF BICKNELL POLICE DEPT et al
as 2:2016cv00212
Plaintiff:
BRENT LELAND ARTHUR
Defendant:
KEVIN CARROL, CITY OF BICKNELL POLICE DEPT and KNOX CO. INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Juarez, Elpidio v. Walter, Carroll et al
as 3:2016cv00181
Plaintiff:
Elpidio Juarez
Defendant:
Carroll Walter , Jean Felber and Anthony Hentz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright, Jason v. Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Wright
Defendant:
Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections, Sauk County Public Defenders Office, Sauk County Dept of Corrections Unit #811 Parole and Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. N AND S Towing Company
as 2:2015cv01492
Plaintiff:
Elias Lamont Carroll
Defendant:
N&S Towing Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
