Cases 41 - 50 of 115
McDaniel v. Steele
as 2:2017cv01495
Plaintiff:
Milton McDaniel
Defendant:
Steele
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey North v. Charles Lockett, et al
as 17-3147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY NORTH
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT, Warden, WILLIAM E. WILSON, TRACY HEISER and others
Blaney v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv01099
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Blaney
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. KRUEGER et al
as 2:2017cv00467
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, JANE/JOHN DOES, JEFFREY E. KRUEGER and others
Plaintiff:
LEN DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McDaniels v. Smith et al
as 2:2017cv01056
Plaintiff:
Carlos C McDaniels
Defendant:
Judy Smith , Jim Zanon, Todd Gillingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PARKER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv00174
Defendant:
CHARLES A. DANIELS, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and DAVID ROYER
Plaintiff:
LEE MCDANIEL PARKER
HSA:
A. RUPSKA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bentz et al v. Godinez et al
as 3:2017cv00315
Plaintiff:
David Robert Bentz, Jesse R. Perez, Marcus A. Barry and others
Defendant:
Salvador Godinez, Donald Stolworthy, Gladyse Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner, Glenn v. Boughton, Gary et al
as 3:2017cv00203
Plaintiff:
Glenn T. Turner
Defendant:
Gary Boughton , T. Hermans, Tim Haines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHADWICK v. NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 1:2017cv00661
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN T. CHADWICK
Defendant:
HALL, MCDANIELS, NEW CASTLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Milton McDaniel v. Unknown Officers, et al
as 17-1177
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON MCDANIEL
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN OFFICERS, sued as Correction Officers and UNKNOWN NURSE, sued as Nurse
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
