Cases 41 - 50 of 915
Keenan v. Holland et al
as 3:2023cv50454
Plaintiff:
Jacob D. Keenan
Defendant:
Michael Holland, Phillip Schnider, Brandon Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDougal v. Milwaukee County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv01670
Plaintiff:
Freddie James McDougal, Jr
Defendant:
Milwaukee County Jail, Ernell Lucas, Dr Ben Weston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jeffery Henson v. City of Danville, et al
as 23-3349
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY T. HENSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DANVILLE, PHILLIP M. WILSON, RALPH DUNHAM and others
PARRA v. CREAR et al
as 3:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
GERMAN PARRA
Defendant:
CREAR, BOSTOCK, SPAYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PHILLIPS v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00563
Petitioner:
KAVOSAYE PHILLIPS
Respondent:
T. RULE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Dominguez v. Hughes et al
as 1:2023cv16285
Plaintiff:
Luis Dominguez
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources, Dr. David Poor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Blakely et al
as 1:2023cv15970
Plaintiff:
Raasikh Phillips
Defendant:
Tianna Blakely
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lawson v. Sage et al
as 3:2023cv00946
Plaintiff:
Willard Will Bee Lawson
Defendant:
A Sage, Guzman, M Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paynic v. Alton, IL et al
as 3:2023cv03500
Plaintiff:
Nichalas John Paynic
Defendant:
City of Alton, IL, City of East Alton, IL, Alton Police Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ladewig v. Perez et al
as 2:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
Michael William Ladewig
Defendant:
Amanda Perez, Dr Phillip Wheatley, Bryan Royce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
