Cases 51 - 60 of 7,830
Ridley v. Vanihel et al
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Daren Earl Ridley and Daren E Ridley
Defendant:
Frank Vanihel, K Gilmore, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Plaskey et al
as 2:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
James Cross
Defendant:
Tracy Plaskey, Amber Moeller, Nicole Schwaller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis, Daniel v. Stafford, Bridgette et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Daniel F.W. Lewis
Defendant:
Bridgette L. Stafford, Rey R. Palop, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Worden et al
as 3:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
William James Ray
Defendant:
T Worden, Snow, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dida v. Doe 1
as 3:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARAMARK, GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
CAMERONS PETERON
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN, FLOWER'S DORM REP, CO'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Bamke et al
as 2:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Gregory Perkins
Defendant:
Aaron Bamke, Jane Doe and Gary Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2024cv04522
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, John Doe 1, Susan Shobol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyce v. Peterburs et al
as 1:2024cv04508
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boyce
Defendant:
Jason Peterburs, Kimberly Fox, Law Office of the Cook County Public Defender and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
