Cases 51 - 60 of 30,411
Brown v. Grant County Prosecutor Agency et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Petitioner:
Lloyd Brown and Lloyd Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Service List
Respondent:
Grant County Prosecutor Agency, Grant County Probation Agency, Marion, Indiana City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moorman v. Jones et al
as 3:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Kir Moorman
Defendant:
Jones and Garcia
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. CENTURION HEALTH, et al
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
ROJAE BROWN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, TEAH, JOHN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00380
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Respondent:
Division Of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DURHAM v. EMERSON
as 1:2024cv00538
Petitioner:
DARRELL DURHAM
Respondent:
EMERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GUTIERREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00800
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO MOJICA GUTIERREZ and CHRISTOPHER MONTOYA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rogers v. Lott
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Tiger A Rogers
Defendant:
Lott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GHOLSTON v. CARTER et al
as 1:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM GHOLSTON
Defendant:
JASON CARTER, JAEKAR TEAH and CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARTIN v. BRIDGES et al
as 1:2024cv00793
Plaintiff:
MARK L. MARTIN, II
Defendant:
CLARENCE BRIDGES, MICHAEL CECIL, BRENDA FELIX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STEWART v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00775
Petitioner:
ROBERT STEWART
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
