Cases 61 - 70 of 371
LEWIS v. HYATTE et al
as 1:2022cv00555
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER G. LEWIS
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATTE, MARY LASSITER, JACQUELINE SCAIFE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Jayme Smith and Jayme Lee Smith
Defendant:
Coltin Clark, Patty Clouse, Lind L Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. C.C.D.O.C et al
as 1:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Quincy E. Cole
Defendant:
C.C.D.O.C, Tom Dart and Isi B. Wray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timmerman v. Rankin et al
as 2:2022cv02044
Plaintiff:
Karlie Timmerman
Defendant:
Jimmy Rankin, Kyle Childress, Haley Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Cochran et al
as 3:2022cv00126
Plaintiff:
Anthony L Cole
Defendant:
Cochran, William Hyatt and Indiana Department of Correction
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
West v. Kind et al
as 2:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Rufus West and Muslim Mansa Lutalo Iyapo
Defendant:
John Kind, Lt Cole, Cindy O'Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Jerome Combs Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv02032
Plaintiff:
Eric Cole
Defendant:
Jerome Combs Detention Center, . Maldonado and . Lehning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Cooley et al
as 1:2022cv01014
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cole
Defendant:
. Cooley, . Brooks and . Berchard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. Staley et al
as 1:2022cv01009
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cole
Defendant:
B Staley, P Smith and Leonta Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Gondek et al
as 1:2021cv06542
Plaintiff:
Donald Haywood
Defendant:
E. Gondek, A. McGee, Y. Tefledzhuk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
