Cases 1 - 10 of 10
STRONG v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 3:2023cv00179
Plaintiff:
SEAN STRONG
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, BRANCHVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, ARAMARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2022cv00498
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ROBERT CARTER, KATHY ALVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICHARD BROWN, LAGENAUER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDWARDS v. CARTER et al
as 3:2020cv00172
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, DEA GOAD, KATHY ALVEY and others
Plaintiff:
TEVIN R. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORINGTON v. ZOLEY et al
as 2:2019cv00336
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA NORINGTON and SHAWNTRELL NORINGTON
Defendant:
GEORGE C. ZOLEY, NOAH SNIDER, DOUGLAS ADKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NORINGTON v. ZOLEY et al
as 1:2019cv01185
Defendant:
KRUL, GEORGE C. ZOLEY, M. LOGAN and others
Plaintiff:
LAKESHA NORINGTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOTKINS v. SAYLOR et al
as 1:2019cv00631
Defendant:
SHAW, DAVIS, SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY ARTHUR BOTKINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2018cv02049
Defendant:
GOAD, ALLEE, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTWAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Perez et al
as 1:2015cv01084
Plaintiff:
Harold Oliver
Defendant:
Timothy D Perez, James Carothers, Kevwe Akpore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Arcola Police Dept et al
as 3:2009cv03307
Plaintiff:
Jason Cox
Defendant:
Arcola Police Dept, Steven Sudding, . Bean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
