Cases 1 - 10 of 159
ACEVEDO v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00345
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ACEVEDO v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
GEORGE ALEXANDER ACEVEDO
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and PUTNAMVILLE CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. Nichols et al
as 2:2021cv00014
Plaintiff:
Luis Acevedo
Defendant:
Heather Nichols, James M Billings, Steven D Picerne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Acevedo et al
as 1:2018cv06698
Defendant:
City Of Chicago and Aaron Acevedo
Plaintiff:
Booker Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zerler v. Allen County Sheriff et al
as 1:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Zachary Zerler
Defendant:
Allen County Sheriff, Justin Stone, Joshua Garmater and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wells v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv05245
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Wells
Defendant:
Eddie Johnson, Aaron Acevedo, Joseph Angarone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bey v. Knox et al
as 1:2017cv00155
Plaintiff:
Mutahir El'Maharib Talib Alim Bey
Defendant:
Sgt Knox, Chad Reeves, Confinement/Block Officer Apps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acevedo v. Lake County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv01146
Plaintiff:
Daniel Acevedo
Defendant:
Lake County Jail, Lake County Sheriffs Office, Mark Curan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Francisco Calderon-Acevedo v. USA
as 16-3566
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRANCISCO CALDERON-ACEVEDO
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CALDERON-ACEVEDO v. QUINTANA et al
as 1:2016cv01422
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO CALDERON-ACEVEDO
Respondent:
FRANCISCO QUINTANA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
