Cases 1 - 10 of 69
BUSH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
as 1:2024cv01536
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSH v. PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FAILITY et al
as 1:2024cv01420
Plaintiff:
DEMARCUS DEMERROW BUSH
Defendant:
PENDLETON CORRECTIONAL FAILITY, MARLEX LANEE and DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCloud et al v. Willis et al
as 3:2024cv01802
Defendant:
John Doe 2, Joshua Shoenbeck, Lt. Royster and others
Plaintiff:
David Bush, Larry Langston, Lamar Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEGAN v. ROY et al
as 4:2024cv00079
Defendant:
CASEY, MAREIN, WHITE and others
Plaintiff:
VINCENT PEGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50282
Respondent:
Warden B. Lammer
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
FEY v. WASHINGTON et al
as 4:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR WAYNE FEY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON and STEVE BUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. GAHAN et al
as 4:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER WADE WALLACE, SR.
Defendant:
JEFF GAHAN, TODD BAILEY, HATFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv00455
Petitioner:
Teresa Maye Bush
Respondent:
Warden Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bush v. Graf et al
as 2:2023cv01701
Plaintiff:
Tommy Thorn Bush, Jr
Defendant:
Kyle J Graf, John Doe 1-5 and City of Milwaukee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. Dobbs et al
as 3:2023cv02975
Plaintiff:
Keelan R Bush
Defendant:
Tasha Dobbs, P Martin, Dietary Supervisor Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
