Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Maus, Brian v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
Brian Maus
Defendant:
Kevin Carr, Lizzie Tegels, Garceau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. LaPorte County Superior Court No 1 et al
as 3:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Edward Williams
Defendant:
LaPorte County Superior Court No 1, Jamie Oss, David K Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorgay v. Syndom et al
as 1:2022cv00847
Plaintiff:
Robert Dorgay
Defendant:
Denise Syndom, Neil Thoreson, Angelique Richards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Radek, Adam v. Marathon County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2021cv00520
Plaintiff:
Adam s Radek and Adam S. Radek
Defendant:
Marathon County Sheriff's Department, Scott Parks, Sandra LaDu and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blanchard v. Oss et al
as 3:2021cv00425
Defendant:
La Porte County Jail, Elizabeth Boehm, Jaime Oss and others
Plaintiff:
Lavara Blanchard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLANCHARD v. OSS et al
as 1:2021cv01525
Defendant:
LA PORTE COUNTY JAIL, ELIZABETH BOEHM and JAIME OSS
Plaintiff:
LAVARA BLANCHARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2020cv00255
Defendant:
John Lake, Michael Bergerson, Mark Roule and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Bergerson et al
as 3:2019cv00978
Plaintiff:
Charles H Scott
Defendant:
Micheal Bergerson and Elizabeth Boehm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Means v. Bergerson et al
as 3:2019cv00977
Defendant:
Elizabeth Boehm and Micheal Bergerson
Plaintiff:
Ronald T Means, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Bergerson et al
as 3:2019cv00865
Plaintiff:
Charles H Scott, Armann Jamal Johnson and Ronald T Means, Sr
Defendant:
Micheal Bergerson and Elizabeth Boehm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
