Cases 1 - 10 of 90
CRAFT v. SWEARINGEN et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER CRAFT
Defendant:
BRYSON SWEARINGEN, BRADEN CROWLEY, STAN ROARK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv16284
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Deon Coleman
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, Amanda Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thedford v. Christie
as 1:2023cv00485
Plaintiff:
Michael Thedford and Michael Tyrone Thedford, Jr
Defendant:
Nurse Christie and Christie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thedford v. Christie
as 3:2023cv01002
Plaintiff:
Michael Thedford and Michael Tyrone Thedford, Jr
Defendant:
Christie, John Foster and K Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huggins v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv05150
Plaintiff:
DeRayShaun Huggins
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, Rocco Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huggins v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv05123
Plaintiff:
DeRay Shaun Huggins
Defendant:
County Of Cook, M Anguiano, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv04915
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Deon Coleman
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, Amanda Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shawn Christy v. Daniel Sproul
as 23-1940
Petitioner / Appellant:
SHAWN R. CHRISTY
Respondent / Appellee:
DANIEL SPROUL
Christy v. Sproul et al
as 3:2023cv00888
Petitioner:
Shawn R. Christy
Respondent:
Dan Sproul, Mrs. C. Sozal and Kirsten Nielson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BARKER v. CARTER et al
as 1:2023cv00108
Plaintiff:
KENTE BARKER
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., TRICIA PRETORTIOUS, STINE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
