Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Brinkman v. Cline et al
as 2:2022cv01270
Plaintiff:
Rand A Brinkman, Jr
Defendant:
Officer Jeffrey Cline, John Does 1-6 and Kenneth Olstinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCKINLEY v. DOES 1-6
as 2:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
SHAUN ERIC MCKINLEY
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Bradley, Brandon v. Barth, TJ et al
as 3:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
Brandon D. Bradley, Sr.
Defendant:
Dep TJ Barth, Dep Shotliff, Dep John Doe and others
Not Classified By Court:
GBCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bergeron-Davila, Raymond v. Kramer, Jeanie et al
as 3:2021cv00789
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Bergeron-Davila
Defendant:
Jeanie Kramer, Katherine Lyons, Justin RiBault and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility and WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCHMITT v. DOE 1-6 et al
as 3:2021cv00051
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-2, AMY BRADY, KATRINA SANDERS and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ROSS SCHMITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slabon v. Dart et al
as 1:2018cv05914
Plaintiff:
Andrew Slabon
Defendant:
John Doe 1-6, Booker, Swanigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams Bey v. State of Illinois et al
as 4:2018cv04148
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Michael L Tyus, Administrative Review Board and others
Plaintiff:
Montez R Williams Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wiley v. Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv01095
Plaintiff:
Keithus Wiley
Defendant:
John Doe 1-6 and Eddie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Johnson, III v. Robert Redmond, et al
as 17-3352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDWARD JOHNSON, III
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT REDMOND, SERGEANT FERNANDEZ and JOHN DOES, 1-6
Marshaun Boykin v. Thomas Dart, et al
as 16-3874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARSHAUN BOYKIN
Defendant - Appellee:
THOMAS J. DART, SHERIFF BINNS and JOHN DOES, 1-6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
