Cases 1 - 10 of 866
PEEPLES v. U.S. DEPT. OF JUSTICE et al
as 2:2024cv00454
Defendant:
'ICE EM', KALLIS, S. YOUNG and others
Plaintiff:
JOE W. PEEPLES, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wade v. Lerch et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Shauntay Wade
Defendant:
Kyle Lerch, John Doe #1 and Kennedy Majors
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCUTERI v. PRETORIUS et al
as 2:2024cv00435
Defendant:
MELINDA MOSS, SERGEANT COOPER, ROBERT DUPREY and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ANDREW SCUTERI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROLLINS v. OSBORNE et al
as 1:2024cv01525
Defendant:
MARI MILLER, JOHN DOE, ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff:
EVAN ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lazur v. Lake County Sheriff et al
as 2:2024cv00309
Defendant:
Stozer, John Doe, Lake County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lazur
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00712
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMMONS v. FLOYD COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2024cv00115
Defendant:
B. SAWICKI, JOHN DOE 1, FLOYD COUNTY JAIL and others
Plaintiff:
NOAH SIMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FOLLETTE v. WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv01434
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2, WARDEN and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN ALAN FOLLETTE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Doctors et al
as 3:2024cv00704
Defendant:
John Doe, Officers and Doctors
Plaintiff:
Sean D Gates and Sean Gates
Unknown:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
