Cases 1 - 10 of 35
MARELL v. PITTAK et al
as 1:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
BETHANY MARELL
Defendant:
OFFICER JOE PITTAK, OFFICER BRYCE BATLING, OFFICER MAKAYLA ELDRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELDRIDGE v. WEDDELL et al
as 1:2022cv02005
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ELDRIDGE
Defendant:
BRANDON WEDDELL, KONKLE, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Noel, Jr. v. Indiana Metro Police Department, et al
as 22-2724
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
INDIANA METRO POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, MARION COUNTY, INDIANA and others
STEPHENS v. ELDRIDGE
as 1:2022cv01473
Plaintiff:
JAMES STEPHENS
Defendant:
MYLA ELDRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Noel v. Indiana Metro Police Department et al
as 3:2022cv00230
Plaintiff:
James Frank Noel, Jr and James F Noel, Jr
Defendant:
Indiana Metro Police Department, Indianapolis City of, Marion County and others
Not Classified By Court:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eldridge v. Allen County Jail
as 1:2021cv00463
Plaintiff:
Beau A Eldridge
Defendant:
Allen County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Quinn v. Vanderhove et al
as 3:2020cv01245
Defendant:
C/O Martin, Eldridge, C/O Vanderhove and others
Plaintiff:
Chester O'Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOTEP-EL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv01567
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, JR., JOE HOGSETT, DAVID ZIEMBA and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF HOTEP-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOEL v. GREEN et al
as 1:2019cv04824
Defendant:
MYLA A. ELDRIDGE, FRANKLIN WOOTEN, KENNETH GREER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. NOEL, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ELDRIDGE v. USA
as 4:2020cv00016
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
DONALD P. ELDRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
