Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Annamalai et al v. Reynolds et al
as 3:2023cv01210
Plaintiff:
Annamalai Annamalai, Parvathi Sivanadiyan and Swamiji Sri Selvam Siddhar
Defendant:
Jacqueline H. Reynolds, Nathan Ravichandran, Viswanathan Lakshmanan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HUBBELL v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 1:2022cv01562
Plaintiff:
JASON HUBBELL
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and YOLANDA CHAMBERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kidd, Robert v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2021cv00758
Plaintiff:
Robert Pierre Kidd
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gates v. Internal Revenue Service
as 4:2021cv04189
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Gates
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00915
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill Jr v. Internal Revenue Service
as 3:2021cv00565
Plaintiff:
Ronnie LeShawn Hill Jr
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Society et al
as 3:2021cv00310
Defendant:
LaPorte County Metro Operations, LaPorte City Police Department, Nigel Albaneze and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Omar Pratt, Jr, Rev Robert O Pratt, Jr and Robert Omer Pratt, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
