Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Walker v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2022cv06264
Plaintiff:
Khari Walker
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Bradley R Scaduto and J M Toliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godat v. Case et al
as 3:2022cv03213
Plaintiff:
Krista Godat
Defendant:
J M Case, R Treijo, Alex Venable and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Houck v. USA et al
as 3:2016cv01396
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Houck
Defendant:
USA, Maureen Baird, Randall Pass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Houck v. USA, et al
as 3:2016cv01268
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Houck
Defendant:
USA, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Maureen Baird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00255
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Bowen
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections , New Lisbon Correctional Institution, Columbia Correctional Institution and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooser v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv00696
Petitioner:
Tramale J M Hooser
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Walton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
McCauley v. Patterson et al
as 1:2009cv06515
Plaintiff:
Otis McCauley
Defendant:
D. D. Patterson, J. M. Sanders, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOBLEY et al v. BUSS et al
as 3:2009cv00084
Petitioner:
SAMMY ALLEN FRANKIE MOBLEY
Respondent:
EDWIN BUSS, GILBERT PETERS, RON GIBSON and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Mario Villabona-Alvarado v. USA, et al
as 08-3929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARIO VILLABONA-ALVARADO
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, C. A. TURNER, Warden, USP Marion and others
Griffin et al v. Morrin et al
as 1:2008cv05776
Plaintiff:
Tommie Lee Griffin
Defendant:
D. J. Morrin, S. R. Storck, Lawrence J. Herhold and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
