Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Soman v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv01732
Plaintiff:
Sterling L Soman
Defendant:
Sara L Robbins, Tracy L Thompson, Michael Milner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. McAllister et al
as 2:2023cv02275
Plaintiff:
Dontrell L Thompson
Defendant:
John McAllister, Shane Standifer and City of Champaign, IL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sellers v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv01039
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dane Sellers
Defendant:
Tracy L Thompson, Julie Ludwig, Kelly Pelky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sellers v. Thompson et al
as 2:2023cv01014
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Dane Sellers
Defendant:
Tracy L Thompson, Julie Ludwig, Kelly Pelky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stewart, Timothy v. Severson, Drew et al
as 3:2023cv00020
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lee Stewart, Sr.
Defendant:
Sgt. Drew Severson, Unknown 3rd Shift, #1 Jane Doe, Switch Board Operator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. USA
as 3:2022cv00397
Petitioner:
Jonathan L. Thompson
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Thompson v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2022cv00040
Plaintiff:
Vincent L. Thompson
Defendant:
Warden William Hyatte, Deputy Warden George Payne, Jr., William Hyatte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Kelley et al
as 2:2021cv00851
Plaintiff:
Jonathan L Jones
Defendant:
Jennifer McDermott, L Wilson, Dr William B Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Does
as 3:2020cv01175
Defendant:
John/Jane Does
Plaintiff:
Bennie L. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Carr et al
as 2:2020cv00280
Petitioner:
Jeffery L Thompson
Respondent:
Kevin Carr and Josh Kaul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
