Cases 1 - 10 of 219
King, Aerion v. Rutledge et al
as 3:2024cv00503
Defendant:
Lt. Lloyd, Dr. Stange, RN Bonnie and others
Plaintiff:
Aerion King
Unknown:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Selmon v. Frankel et al
as 2:2024cv00869
Defendant:
Michael Bohren, Mark A Frankel, Lloyd V Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Darryl Selmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2024cv01312
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Mindi Nurse, Dave Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mcghee, Ladarius v. Pratter, Jesse et al
as 3:2024cv00612
Defendant:
John Doe 1-3, Sgt. Timothy Rutledge, C.O. Jesse Pratter and others
Plaintiff:
Ladarius Deequanmay Mcghee
Unknown:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mottley v. Rock et al
as 3:2024cv02046
Plaintiff:
Skylar Mottley and Devin Mottley
Defendant:
John Doe, Anthony Jones, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LLOYD v. USA
as 2:2024cv00417
Defendant:
USA
Plaintiff:
MARIO HOWARD LLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd, Nathaniel v. Department of Corrections, Wisconsin
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel J. Lloyd
Defendant:
The Department of Corrections, Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stanley Boclair v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 24-2406
Defendant:
DAVID L. EVELSIZER, ROB JEFFREYS, Acting Director, ROBERT MUELLER, Southern Regional Director and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
Stanley Boclair v. Rob Jeffreys, et al
as 24-2397
Defendant:
LLOYD HANNA, Dietary Manager, FRANK LAWRENCE, Former Warden, ROB JEFFREYS, Acting Director and others
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BOCLAIR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00399
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
