Cases 1 - 10 of 28
LAMPE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
DEVAN LAMPE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN and CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampe v. Ingrim
as 3:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Devan CR Lampe and Devan Lampe
Defendant:
M Ingrim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampe v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00451
Petitioner:
Devan CR Lampe and Devan Lampe
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lampe v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
Devan CR Lampe and Devan Lampe
Defendant:
William R Hyatte, Jaqueline Scaife and Robert Bennett
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampe v. Kirby et al
as 3:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Devan CR Lampe and Devan Lampe
Defendant:
K Kirby and William Hyatte
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Atwater v. Rollins et al
as 2:2019cv01576
Defendant:
Sgt John, Mark Rice, Julie Nickels and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Atwater
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RANKINS v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2019cv00165
Defendant:
J. LAMPING, UNITED STATES, DOE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL RANKINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lampe v. Warden
as 3:2019cv00053
Respondent:
Warden
Petitioner:
Devan CR Lampe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pennewell v. State of Wisconsin Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2017cv00213
Plaintiff:
James Vern Pennewell
Defendant:
James Parish, J Richter, Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv00435
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, JEFF LAMPING, L. LARIVA and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
