Cases 1 - 10 of 1,069
Andreas Moore, Jr. v. Michelle Hoffman
as 24-1586
Petitioner:
ANDREAS L. MOORE, JR.
Respondent:
MICHELLE HOFFMAN
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2024cv50220
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Defendant:
Kwame Raoul, The Illinois Attorney Generals Office, The Inspector General of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Wolfe et al
as 2:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Defendant:
Julie Moore Wolfe, City of Decatur Illinois, Jim Root and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Woodridge v. Cook County Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-1968
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY WOODRIDGE
Defendant:
COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, G. MOORE and SEAN JONES
MOORE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00206
Plaintiff:
DUSTINE MOORE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. ERNEST et al
as 1:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
REONTE C. MOORE
Defendant:
JASON ERNEST, MARTIN and D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. JAIL COMMANDER et al
as 1:2024cv00883
Plaintiff:
TONY MOORE
Defendant:
JAIL COMMANDER, BAKER, BELLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perales v. Walworth County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2024cv00644
Plaintiff:
Tony Perales
Defendant:
Walworth County Sheriff's Department, Sheriff Pinkell, Superintendent Delaney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olden v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03130
Plaintiff:
Terrance Olden
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, . Clarkson, Christy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jesse McComb v. Robert Wineman, et al
as 24-1419
Plaintiff:
JESSE MCCOMB
Defendant:
ROBERT WINEMAN, MARY MOORE, SHERYL PIERRE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
