Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Gospodinov v. Hudson et al
as 3:2018cv50314
Plaintiff:
Emil Dimitrov Gospodinov
Defendant:
Teri Gregory, Capt. Paul Harvey, Michael Kruger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TROYA v. INCH et al
as 2:2018cv00311
Defendant:
M. THOMAS, MARK S. INCH, J. E. KRUEGER and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL A. TROYA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Monk v. Dawn et al
as 3:2018cv01318
Plaintiff:
Marvin D. Monk
Defendant:
Michelle Dawn, Eric Edmister, S. Byrum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stauffer, Jerry v. Connors, Ian et al
as 3:2017cv00905
Plaintiff:
Jerry Stauffer
Defendant:
Ian Connors , Sara M. Revell , Louis Williams, II and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Regassa v. Sanders et al
as 3:2017cv00999
Plaintiff:
Admassu Regassa
Defendant:
K. Sanders, R. Baskerville, C. Krawczyk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jermel Pope v. M. Hewitt, et al
as 17-2875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMEL POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
M. HEWITT, Mailroom Supervisor, JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden, SARA M. REVELL, Regional Director and others
Clark v. Watson et al
as 1:2017cv01231
Plaintiff:
Bradley Scott Clark, Sr
Defendant:
Thomas Watson, Jeffrey Rendon, Sara M Revell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jermel Pope v. M. Hewitt, et al
as 17-1564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERMEL POPE
Defendant - Appellee:
M. HEWITT, Mailroom Supervisor, JEFFREY KRUEGER, Warden, SARA M. REVELL, Regional Director and others
KADAMOVAS v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2017cv00050
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, CAPTAIN, JOHN CARAWAY and others
Recruited Counsel:
ONI N. HARTON, JOHN MALEY and LADENE MENDOZA
Plaintiff:
JURIJUS KADAMOVAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pope v. Holzaphel et al
as 1:2016cv01479
Plaintiff:
Jermel Pope
Defendant:
William Holzaphel, Milinda King, Jefferey E. Krueger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
