Cases 1 - 10 of 158
Shareef Childs v. Cheryl Webster, et al
as 24-1817
Plaintiff:
SHAREEF CHILDS
Defendant:
CHERYL WEBSTER, CRAIG LINDGREN and STEVE MOHR
Darrell Rogers v. Nevin Webster, et al
as 24-1516
Plaintiff:
DARRELL ROGERS
Defendant:
NEVIN WEBSTER and BRETT HELMER
Moore v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04025
Plaintiff:
Allen Moore
Defendant:
Greg Donathan, Erin Posey, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braithwaite, Joshua v. Simcox et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Joshua P. Braithwaite
Defendant:
Mr. Simcox, Ms. Mink, Ms. Lemieux and others
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tony Webster v. Kellen Williams, et al
as 23-3425
Plaintiff:
TONY WEBSTER
Defendant:
KELLEN WILLIAMS, JUSTIN GALL, SHAMAILA GORSI and others
Webster v. Cromwell
as 2:2023cv01348
Petitioner:
Jatavious Kawan Webster
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RONDEAU et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01749
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RONDEAU, BRADY TURNER, CORY GRAY and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fort v. People Of The State Of Illinois et al
as 3:2023cv50262
Plaintiff:
Lonnell Isiah Fort
Defendant:
People Of The State Of Illinois, C. Jones, Troy Hadie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Webster et al
as 2:2023cv00812
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Walker
Defendant:
Mr Webster and Waupun Library Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
