Cases 91 - 100 of 185
Mister v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00149
Defendant:
Susan Griffin, Illinois Department of Corrections, Dr. Nawoor and others
Plaintiff:
Sharvelt Mister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mister v. Obadina et al
as 3:2019cv00148
Defendant:
Ms. Lisa Krebs, Illinois Department of Corrections, Dr. Santos and others
Plaintiff:
Sharvelt Mister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Cermack Hospital et al
as 1:2019cv00344
Defendant:
Ammon, Dr. Hamalton, Gavin and others
Plaintiff:
Phillip Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCFATE v. COOK MEDICAL LLC et al
as 1:2018cv03698
Plaintiff:
GAVIN MCFATE
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GAVIN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03435
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
SHELITA GAVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Podkulski v. Youksoulian et al
as 1:2018cv07089
Defendant:
Director Gavin, Martha Youksoulian and 8 Various John & Jane Doe Sgts and Lts.
Plaintiff:
Steven Podkulski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez, Landy v. Gavins, Laticia
as 3:2018cv00773
Plaintiff:
Landy Cardenas Hernandez
Defendant:
Laticia Gavins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willis v. Profressional Service Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv03653
Plaintiff:
Douglas A Willis
Defendant:
Profressional Service Industries, Inc. , Intertek USA Inc. , Todd Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shelton, Dartavis et al v. Ericksen, Pete et al
as 3:2018cv00341
Plaintiff:
Dartavis Shelton
Defendant:
Pete Ericksen , Jean Zwier, Michael Baenen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mosholu, Inc. et al v. Gavin et al
as 1:2018cv02721
Plaintiff:
Mosholu, Inc. , Michael Margules and Edward Amaral
Defendant:
Sean Gavin and Malcolm Herzog
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
