Cases 91 - 100 of 306
Smith v. Mado et al
as 1:2021cv00638
Defendant:
Jacob Fyda, Salvation Army Harbor Light, Scott Viniard and others
Plaintiff:
Charles E Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv03030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Otis v. Flos
as 2:2020cv01711
Plaintiff:
Jill L Otis
Defendant:
State of Wisconsin, Marie Flos and Racine County Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clarence Jackson v. State of Illinois, et al
as 20-2718
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLARENCE B. JACKSON
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF ILLINOIS and ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, Bureau of Heraings c/o Division of Vocational Rehabilitational Services
Johnson et al v. Illinois Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2020cv04763
Plaintiff:
Jon Johnson, Desmond Randolph, Kevin Johnson and others
Defendant:
Sharon Coleman, Tom Zubik, Illinois Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hassan v. Illinois Department of Human Services-Elgin et al
as 1:2020cv04002
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Human Services-Elgin
Plaintiff:
Mahad Hassan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andre Winston v. Diana Dobier, et al
as 20-2083
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANDRE WINSTON
Defendant / Appellee:
DIANA B. DOBIER, WANDA PENNOCK, REBECCA HOUZENGA and others
Woodruff v. Illinois Department of Human Service/T.D.F. et al
as 4:2020cv04104
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Human Service/T.D.F., Paula Lodge, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky D Woodruff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Jackson v. State of Illinois et al
as 2:2020cv02081
Plaintiff:
Clarence Jackson
Defendant:
State of Illinois and Illinois Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
