Cases 111 - 118 of 118
BLY et al v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICIAL SERVICE
as 2:2007cv00163
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER B BLY
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, ALFRED TALENS, ANWER JAFFRI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GILMAN v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 2:2007cv00161
Plaintiff:
GILMAN
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, ELTON AMOS, BRENDA BARNARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2007cv00796
Plaintiff:
NIKOLE D. SMITH
Defendant:
FRANK J. ANDERSON, FRANK J. ANDERSON, GARY TINGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mora v. Westville Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2007cv00259
Plaintiff:
Marte Mora
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility, Correctional Medical Services, Prison Health Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DEWITT v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES et al
as 1:2007cv00591
Plaintiff:
ALFRAZIER DEWITT
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, ASHRAF KALU, M.D. and JOHN DOE CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EVANS v. POSKON et al
as 1:2007cv00592
Defendant:
FRANK ANDERSON, JEFFREY AVINGTON, DR. JOHN BOE and others
Unknown:
Jonathan Lamont Mayes, Jonathan Lamont Mayes, Jonathan Lamont Mayes and others
Plaintiff:
TY EVANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PAVESE v. CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2007cv00431
Plaintiff:
PAMELA PAVESE
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC. and CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
MAYES v. ANDERSON et al
as 1:2007cv00360
Plaintiff:
PAUL CARLETON MAYES
Defendant:
FRANK ANDERSON, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
