Cases 111 - 120 of 325
McBride et al v. Cook County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2017cv04951
Plaintiff:
Jasmin McBride and Lorenzo Smith
Defendant:
Cook County Sheriff's Office, Officer Murphy, Officer Mousel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Doyle et al
as 1:2017cv04805
Plaintiff:
Andrew Bernard Walton
Defendant:
Doyle, Nurse Coleman, Nurse Ogbuli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 b3 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Doyle v. Eli Lilly & Company et al
as 1:2017cv04586
Plaintiff:
Damon Doyle
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company, Lilly USA LLC, Acrux Commercial Pty Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Howe v. Wexford Health et al
as 1:2017cv03438
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Howe
Defendant:
Wexford Health, Vendor For Profit Corp, Stateville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. BURGESS
as 1:2017cv00925
Defendant:
DOYLE BURGESS
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Patrick Quinn, et al v. Board of Education of the City, et al
as 17-1565
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PATRICK QUINN, Officer, IRENE ROBINSON, ANTWAIN MILLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE CITY OF CHICAGO, JAMES MEEKS, STEVEN R. GILFORD and others
Hixson et al v. Gottschalk et al
as 3:2017cv00166
Plaintiff:
Janet Pichon Hixson and Richard Hixson
Defendant:
Stephanie Gottschalk, Margery Justice, Ryan Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONE v. WRIGHT et al
as 2:2017cv00092
Defendant:
CITY OF CLINTON, INDIANA and DOYLE T. WRIGHT
Plaintiff:
HEATHER STONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doyle v. Colvin
as 1:2017cv00885
Plaintiff:
Patricia Ann Doyle
Defendant:
Carolyn Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
