Cases 111 - 120 of 204
Segovia v. Rutledge et al
as 1:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Juan Daniel Segovia
Defendant:
Larry Rutledge, Sam Kamdar, Ron-da and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Board of Commissioners St. Joseph County, Indiana et al
as 3:2015cv00330
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Freeman
Defendant:
Board of Commissioners St. Joseph County, Indiana and St Joseph County Highway Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Freeman Jr v. Fort Wayne City of et al
as 1:2015cv00129
Plaintiff:
Dennis Freeman Jr
Defendant:
Fort Wayne City of and David Gladieux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. IDOC et al
as 1:2015cv00532
Defendant:
DAVID BARR, IDOC, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
GALEN FREEMAN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irby v. Superintendent
as 3:2015cv00086
Petitioner:
Freeman Irby
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ware v. Gary School City et al
as 2:2015cv00042
Plaintiff:
Glenn D Ware
Defendant:
Gary School City, Gary City of, Karen Freeman-Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUELLER v. CITY OF GREENFIELD et al
as 1:2015cv00087
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENFIELD, CALEB FREEMAN and GREENFIELD POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MUELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
FREEMAN v. LARIVA
as 2:2014cv00393
Petitioner:
JAMES FREEMAN
Respondent:
LEANN LARIVA and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
FREEMAN v. ZATECKY
as 1:2014cv01970
Petitioner:
GALEN FREEMAN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FREEMAN v. ZATECKY
as 1:2014cv01859
Petitioner:
GALEN FREEMAN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
ZATECKY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
