Cases 121 - 130 of 203
Freeman v. Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner et al
as 3:2014cv01987
Plaintiff:
de'Carlos Freeman
Defendant:
Indiana Department of Corrections Commissioner, M Rizner, C McKinney and others
Miscellaneous_party:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FREEMAN v. BURDINE
as 1:2014cv01236
Defendant:
BURDINE
Plaintiff:
GALEN FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. INDIANA PAROLE BOARD et al
as 1:2014cv01047
Defendant:
BRAD FREEMAN and INDIANA PAROLE BOARD
Plaintiff:
GARY MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAGHON v. STORMS et al
as 2:2014cv00192
Defendant:
BUTTS, COLLINS, L. FREEMAN and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN TAGHON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00180
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Freeman v. Biomet Orthopedics, LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01205
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Freeman
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet Inc, Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman et al v. Biomet Orthopaedics LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00194
Plaintiff:
Leonard C Freeman and Janet Freeman
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet Inc , Biomet Manufacturing Corp and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Freeman v. Wentz et al
as 1:2013cv00243
Plaintiff:
Frederick L Freeman
Defendant:
Mark Wentz, Thomas Strausborger, Robert Hollo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chuang et al v. Rosenski et al
as 2:2013cv00195
Plaintiff:
Charles Chuang and Kay Kim
Defendant:
Donald W Rosenski , W Oliver , Anthony Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
FREEMAN v. WARREN et al
as 1:2013cv00869
Plaintiff:
GALEN FREEMAN
Defendant:
RANDALL P. GENTRY, TIM A. GROGG, THOR R. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
