Cases 121 - 130 of 196
Sandifer v. Kneller et al
as 2:2014cv00325
Plaintiff:
Raven J Sandifer and Ravenous Enterprises Inc
Defendant:
Gary Kneller, Linda L Brown, Edward McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Petit v. Sisson et al
as 1:2013cv00349
Plaintiff:
Stacy E Petit
Defendant:
Tom Sisson, Shawn McGuire and Marion Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGuire v. ORGANON USA, INC et al
as 1:2013cv01596
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY MCGUIRE
Defendant:
MERCK & COMPANY INC, MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, N.V. ORGANON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sprehe v. Gaetz et al
as 3:2013cv00997
Plaintiff:
Randy Sprehe
Defendant:
Donald Gaetz, Sgt McGuire, Sgt McElyea and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v Gaetz et al
as 3:2013cv00961
Plaintiff:
Tony Hickman
Defendant:
Donald Gaetz, Sgt McGuire, C/O Swallers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 3:2013cv00677
Plaintiff:
Richard Jamison , Edward Jarrell , Edward Jesse and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Muhammad v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv04108
Plaintiff:
Miykael Muhammad
Defendant:
City of Chicago and McGuire
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
McGuire v. Chandler
as 3:2013cv50155
Petitioner:
Ricky L McGuire
Respondent:
Nedra Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McGuire v. Zimmer, Inc et al
as 1:2013cv03147
Plaintiff:
Mary. McGuire
Defendant:
Zimmer, Inc and Zimmer Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Muhammad v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv02916
Plaintiff:
Miykael Muhammad
Defendant:
City of Chicago and McGuire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
