Cases 11 - 20 of 5,996
PETERON v. PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN et al
as 1:2024cv00914
Plaintiff:
CAMERONS PETERON
Defendant:
PLAINFIELD CORRECTION WARDEN, FLOWER'S DORM REP, CO'S and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ray v. Worden et al
as 3:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
William James Ray
Defendant:
T Worden, Snow, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Slater et al
as 3:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
James Michael Wright
Defendant:
Kyle Slater, St. Joe County Police and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv00906
Plaintiff:
AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant:
ARAMARK, GEO GROUP INC., MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Slater et al
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
James Michael Wright
Defendant:
Kyle Slater, St. Joe County Police and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mayberry v. Buss et al
as 3:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Timothy Marcus Mayberry
Defendant:
Edwin G Buss, Jane/John Doe 1, Jane/John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PIERCE, JR. v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00894
Plaintiff:
JOHN A. PIERCE, JR.
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Miksch v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00430
Petitioner:
John Miksch
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
KAPETANIOS v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL KAPETANIOS, SR.
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL, COURTNEY FISCHER, LYDIA JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2024cv00861
Plaintiff:
STEVEN RAY YOUNG
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL, ARN HOLT, LYDIA JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
