Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Mitchell v. Dowdy et al
as 3:2020cv03339
Plaintiff:
Darnell Mitchell
Defendant:
C Marsaglia, Anthony Biggers, Troy Dowdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blaylock et al v. Twin Restaurant, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv04648
Plaintiff:
Rachel Anderson, Susan Winfield, Johnae Farr and others
Defendant:
Twin Restaurant Franchise, LLC, Twin Restaurant Warrenville, LLC, Twin Restaurant Investment Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Dennis v. Davis et al
as 4:2019cv04147
Defendant:
R Davis, Leonta Jackson, . Gresham and others
Plaintiff:
Roy C Dennis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Susie Bigger v. Facebook, Inc.
as 19-1944
Defendant / Appellant:
FACEBOOK, INC.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUSIE BIGGER
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW PROJECT
Facebook Inc. v. Susie Bigger
as 19-8011
Respondent:
SUSIE BIGGER
Petitioner:
FACEBOOK INCORPORATED and FACEBOOK, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Winchester v. Illinois Republican Party et al
as 3:2018cv01137
Plaintiff:
Robert Winchester
Defendant:
Illinois Republican Party , Shaun Murphy, Judy Diekelman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bigger v. Facebook, Inc.
as 1:2017cv07753
Plaintiff:
Susie Bigger
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Norwood v. Robeson et al
as 3:2017cv03230
Plaintiff:
Lawrence H Norwood
Defendant:
Kess Robeson, . Hess, . Bigger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Gardner v. Holly Clemmons, et al
as 13-2149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL GARDNER
Defendant - Appellee:
HOLLY F. CLEMMONS, GAIL ROGERS and TAMARA BIGGERS
Gardner v. Clemmons et al
as 2:2013cv02027
Plaintiff:
Michael Gardner
Defendant:
Holly F Clemmons, Gail Rogers and Tamara Biggers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
