Cases 11 - 20 of 2,054
BROWN v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00946
Plaintiff:
JAMES MICHAEL BROWN
Defendant:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
BROWNING v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BROWNING
Defendant:
ADAMS and WALK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States Steel Corporation v. Summit Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
United States Steel Corporation
Defendant:
Summit Inc, Stone Transport LP, Load n Go Express LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Damages to Interstate Shipments by Motor Carriers
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00313
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLANTON v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
RODIA BLANTON
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION and RICHARD BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Donald Brown
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Brown v. Grand Junction Semiconductor PTE. Ltd et al
as 3:2024cv00429
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brown
Defendant:
Grand Junction Semiconductor PTE. Ltd and Robert Marassa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gydesen v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Morris Gydesen
Defendant:
Brian Miller, Kevin Madden, Troy Waidelich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
