Cases 11 - 20 of 567
Romero Flores v. Marten Transport LTD
as 1:2024cv02369
Plaintiff:
Romero Flores Olga and Olga Romero Flores
Defendant:
Marten Transport LTD and Bradley Sather
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Flores v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
as 1:2024cv02021
Plaintiff:
EUSTOLIO FLORES
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation Amtrak and National Railroad Passenger Corp. doing business as Amtrak
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Valerie Flores v. Progressive Insurance Company, et al
as 24-1745
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. FLORES
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE INSURANCE COMPANY, SUMMIT CREDIT UNION, SAMS RV and others
Valerie Flores v. Allen Horn, et al
as 24-1746
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. FLORES
Defendant:
ALLEN HORN, CODY WOODS, HOPE BARAJAS and others
Dekeyser et al v. Burns et al
as 2:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
ALLEN J DEKEYSER, MARQUETA T DEKEYSER, Allen Dekeyser and others
Defendant:
PO LEON BURNS, PO ADAM RUSCH, CITY OF MILWAUKEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01687
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
USA v. Heriberto Carbajal-Flores
as 24-1534
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
HERIBERTO CARBAJAL-FLORES
McNeil v. Watts et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Mickel McNeil and Mickel J. McNeil
Defendant:
Watts, G- Lewis, Farley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
