Cases 11 - 20 of 8,556
AO Smith Water Treatment (North America) Inc v. Discounted Water Filters Inc
as 2:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
AO Smith Water Treatment (North America) Inc
Defendant:
Discounted Water Filters Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
SMITH v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00299
Petitioner:
DANIEL SMITH
Respondent:
TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Zanger et al
as 3:2024cv03148
Plaintiff:
Erik Mills
Defendant:
. Zanger and . Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LANE v. SMITH
as 2:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant:
SMITH SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COVINGTON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
TODD E. COVINGTON
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, RANDALL, TRAVIS DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Krysta M. Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
MCCARTHY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2024cv00971
Plaintiff:
BRIAN JOSEPH MCCARTHY
Defendant:
A. SMITH and GEO/N.C.C.F.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Micheal Attaway v. Darren Galloway, et al
as 24-1985
Plaintiff:
MICHEAL N.B. ATTAWAY
Defendant:
DARREN GALLOWAY, Warden, Prison Warden, Shawnee CC, AMANDA SMITH, Mental Health Director, Shawnee CC, LATOYA HUGHES, Director, IDOC and others
SMITH v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SMITH
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
Edward A. Banks
Defendant:
M. Smith, Duffy, Ford Transit Van Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
