Cases 11 - 20 of 121
Green v. Chicago Behavioral Hospital et al
as 1:2022cv02941
Plaintiff:
Cassidy Green
Defendant:
Chicago Behavioral Hospital and Tayshaun Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Cassidy Green v. Alfonso Valdez
as 22-1999
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSIDY GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
ALFONSO VALDEZ
Green v. Waubonsee Comm. College et al
as 1:2022cv02915
Plaintiff:
Cassidy Green
Defendant:
Waubonsee Comm. College, Guadalupe Martinez, Hope Montalbano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cassidy Green v. Lake Behavioral Hospital, et al
as 22-1936
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSIDY GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
LAKE BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL, VON' CELLE DOE, JOHN DOE and others
CASSIDY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA) et al
as 4:2022cv00065
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER M. CASSIDY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE (USDA), ANIMAL PLANT HEALTH INSPECTION SERVICE (APHIS) and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Cassidy Green v. Block, Inc., et al
as 22-1702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CASSIDY GREEN
Defendant / Appellee:
BLOCK, INC., CASH APP and CASH APP SUPPORT TEAM
Cassidy v. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) et al
as 2:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Alexander M. Cassidy
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Animal Plant HEalth Inspection Service (APHIS)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
WHEELER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
TRACEY WHEELER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICHARD BROWN, LAGENAUER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
