Cases 11 - 20 of 408
WHITELOW v. EATON et al
as 2:2022cv00189
Plaintiff:
JB WHITELOW, JR.
Defendant:
EATON, IVY, HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UPSHAW v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00116
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE UPSHAW
Defendant:
VANIHEL, CORIZON MEDICAL and WABASH VALLEY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FLEENOR v. INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2021cv00458
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY FLEENOR, SR.
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT OF CORRECTION, MIAMI FACILITY, PLAINFIELD CORR. FACILITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01404
Petitioner:
MCKINLEY KELLY
Respondent:
DR. JACKIE WEST-DENNING, KIM HOBSON, DR. NAVEEN RAJOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRONE v. IPPEL et al
as 1:2021cv00232
Defendant:
CORIZON, LLC, D. JOHNSON, MICHAEL MITCHEFF and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CRONE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAUDERDALE-EL v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 2:2020cv00486
Defendant:
KEITH HARTZELL, CORIZON CORRECTIONAL INDUSTRIES, SUSAN SMOOTHERY and others
Plaintiff:
LAMONE LAUDERDALE-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boutte' v. State of Indiana et al
as 1:2020cv00329
Defendant:
April Cider, Deputies, Indiana Senator and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Scott Boutte'
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boutte' v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv00328
Defendant:
Aramark, Miami Correctional Facility, Judges and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Scott Boutte'
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danny Richards v. Wexford of Indiana LLC, et al
as 20-2567
Defendant / Appellee:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, JACKIE WEST-DENNING, Dr., SAMUEL BYRD and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANNY R. RICHARDS
ELLINGER v. STREETER et al
as 2:2020cv00335
Defendant:
GREG EWING, JOHN MANEL, CORIZON and others
Plaintiff:
BUDDY ELLINGER JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
