Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Robin J. Vos v. Kenneth F. Ripple, et al
as 19-1910
Respondent:
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, KENNETH F. RIPPLE and JAMES D. PETERSON
Interested Party:
ROGER ANCLAM, MARY LYNNE DONOHUE, EMILY BUNTING and others
Petitioner:
ROBIN J. VOS, Speaker
Jeffrey P. Heist v. James D. Peterson
as 19-1482
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JEFFREY P. HEIST
Respondent:
JAMES D. PETERSON
Peterson v. Emanuelson et al
as 2:2018cv01057
Defendant:
CO Medina, Nurse Jane Doe #2, Lt Emanuelson and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio D Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peterson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv01124
Plaintiff:
Matthew D Peterson
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Peterson v. City Of Waukegan et al
as 1:2016cv06458
Plaintiff:
Ralph D. Peterson, Jr.
Defendant:
City Of Waukegan and Wayne Motley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Moore v. Peterson et al
as 2:2015cv00936
Plaintiff:
Ethan W Moore
Defendant:
Mathew D Peterson, United Hospital System, Jane and John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lloyd Schuenke v. James Peterson
as 14-2851
Petitioner:
LLOYD T. SCHUENKE
Respondent:
JAMES D. PETERSON
Lloyd T. Schuenke v. James D. Peterson
as 14-2580
Petitioner:
LLOYD T. SCHUENKE
Respondent:
JAMES D. PETERSON
HSBC Bank USA, National Association v. Peterson et al
as 1:2012cv10170
Plaintiff:
HSBC Bank USA, National Association
Defendant:
Jeffrey D. Peterson, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. as Nominee for People's Choice Home Loan, Inc., U.S. Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
United States of America v. Peterson et al
as 1:2012cv00222
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Matthew A Peterson, Catherine D Peterson and Adams County Memorial Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
