Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Davis v. Kelley et al
as 1:2018cv00966
Plaintiff:
Marquis Davis
Defendant:
Michael Kelley, Dale Senterells, Jason Prokop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Metropolitan Corrections Center et al
as 1:2016cv09854
Plaintiff:
Sean David Adams
Defendant:
Metropolitan Corrections Center and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moore v. Kelley et al
as 1:2016cv08945
Plaintiff:
Robert Stephen Moore
Defendant:
David Adams, Adrienne Knazze, Johnny C Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antwon Dismuke v. Steve Stemmet, et al
as 15-1754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTWON LESHAUN DISMUKE
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE STEMMET, MARIA LEE, DAVID ADAMS and others
PITTSBURGH GLASS WORKS, LLC v. ADAMS
as 3:2015cv00038
Defendant:
DAVID ADAMS
Plaintiff:
PITTSBURGH GLASS WORKS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Dismuke v. Stemmet et al
as 1:2014cv05803
Plaintiff:
Antwon Leshaun Dismuke
Defendant:
Steve Stemmet, Maria Lee, David Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mabry v. Adams et al
as 1:2013cv08427
Plaintiff:
Ikesha Mabry
Defendant:
David Adams, Cannella School of Hair Design, Inc., Cannella School of Hair Design-Aurora, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Garcia et al v. Five Star Development & Design et al
as 1:2010cv04807
Plaintiff:
Miguel Garcia , Filadelfo Garcia , Eduardo Garcia and others
Defendant:
Five Star Development & Design and Jason Ding
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Williams et al v. Carroll et al
as 1:2008cv04169
Plaintiff:
Shammua Williams
Defendant:
Michael A. Carroll, James J. Obaldo, Alfredo Z. Silva and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv03980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
