Cases 11 - 20 of 980
Daniels v. Bailey et al
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Remo Harrison Daniels and Remo H Daniels
Defendant:
Jerome G Bailey, Sgt Nelson, CO Pach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hess v. MedTorque Inc
as 2:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hess
Defendant:
MedTorque Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hernandez v. Raphael Industries Inc
as 2:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Daniel Hernandez
Defendant:
Raphael Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones, Dynzel v. Sanders, Daniel et al
as 3:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Dynzel Jones
Defendant:
Daniel Sanders, Paula Kuecker, Feltz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Nies et al v. Astrel et al
as 1:2024cv00446
Interpleader:
Wisconsin Department of Health Services d/b/a ForwardHealth
Plaintiff:
Esther Dies, CIGNA National Health Insurance Company, Wisconsin Department of Health Services d/b/a BadgerCare Plus and others
Defendant:
Daniel Astrel and KLLM Transport Services
Intervenor:
UnitedHealthcare
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Siegmann v. Frohling et al
as 2:2024cv00443
Plaintiff:
Daniel Leonard Siegmann
Defendant:
David W Frohling and Danielle J Van Egtern
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Boland v. LaVoie et al
as 2:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Clifford James Boland
Defendant:
Daniel LaVoie and Jamie Barker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Solomon v. Galvin et al
as 2:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Robert Solomon
Defendant:
Adrianna Galvin, Ryan Sharp and Danielle L Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Cushing
as 1:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Michael S Johnson
Defendant:
Lt Daniel Cushing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
