Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Waterstone Mortgage Corporation v. Borngesser, Keith et al
as 3:2019cv00864
Defendant:
Noel Stiller, Grady Brown, Michael Engelking and others
Plaintiff:
Waterstone Mortgage Corporation
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
JONES et al v. CUMMINGS et al
as 1:2019cv02684
Defendant:
RODNEY CUMMINGS and STEVE KOESTER
Plaintiff:
DANIEL KOPP and DAVID JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NAAB CONSULTING, INC v. JONES, MARCESCA, MCQUADE, P.A. et al
as 1:2019cv01829
Defendant:
DAVID JONES and JONES, MARCESCA & MCQUADE, P.A.
Plaintiff:
NAAB CONSULTING, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
David Jones et al v. Village of Richmond et al
as 3:2019cv50080
Plaintiff:
Jones Development Corporation and David Jones
Defendant:
Village of Richmond and Michael J. Chmiel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01987
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
David Jones v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv09322
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Tom Dart, Supt Welsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Barber et al
as 1:2017cv07879
Plaintiff:
David Jones
Defendant:
Davis Barber, Dr. Minella, Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett et al v. McLauren et al
as 3:2017cv00871
Plaintiff:
Carlos Garrett, JaQuel Washington, David Jones and others
Defendant:
Phillip McLauren, Nick Nichols and St. Clair County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bayler et al
as 1:2017cv01344
Plaintiff:
Gregory David Jones
Defendant:
. Bayler, . Melvin, . Polly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Tilden et al
as 1:2017cv01248
Plaintiff:
Gregory David Jones
Defendant:
Andrew Tilden, R Ojelade and Michael P Melvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
