Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Elkins v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2022pq02530
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Donnell Elkins
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Syngenta AG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
THOMPSON v. CUPP et al
as 2:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
TRAE T. THOMPSON
Defendant:
NURSE L. CUPP, HEATHER, ELKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELKINS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv01352
Plaintiff:
PATSY ELKINS
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED and COOK MEDICAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Timothy Elkins, Jr. v. Levi Quinn, et al
as 22-1632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY W. ELKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LEVI QUINN, RONALD VITALE, Warden and ROB JEFFREYS
Timothy Elkins, Jr. v. Keith Frainey, et al
as 21-3067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY W. ELKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
KEITH FRAINEY, MICHAEL WRIGHT, ANASTASIA WIEREMA and others
JOHNSON v. NAJJAR et al
as 2:2021cv00318
Plaintiff:
QUANTAE A. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID K. NAJJAR, TODD RUETZ, JUDITH PROFFITT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. NAJJAR et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Plaintiff:
QUANTAE A JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID K. NAJJAR, TODD RUETZ, MICHELLE MCCUEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Elkins, Jr. v. Sonja Nicklaus, et al
as 21-1461
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY W. ELKINS, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
AMBER ALLEN, Health Care Unit Administrator, SONJA NICKLAUS, Warden, Dixon Correctional Center, ROB JEFFRIES, Placement Officer and others
Timothy Elkins, Jr. v. Sonja Nicklaus
as 21-1069
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY W. ELKINS, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
SONJA NICKLAUS
Elkins, Jr. v. Nicklaus et al
as 3:2020cv50448
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 4, Jane Doe 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Elkins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
