Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Hawkins v. Shannon et al
as 1:2012cv01382
Petitioner:
Michael W. Hawkins
Respondent:
Paul Shannon , Bloomington, Illinois Election Commission , Pat Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Shannon et al
as 1:2012cv06253
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Hawkins
Defendant:
Paul Shannon , Bloomington, Illinois Election Commission , Pat Quinn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Planned Parenthood of Indiana, et al v. Commissioner of the Indiana, et al
as 11-2464
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA, INCORPORATED, MICHAEL KING, M.D., CARLA CLEARY and others
Defendant - Appellant:
COMMISIONER OF THE INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, in his official capacity, DIRECTOR OF THE INDIANA STATE BUDGET AGENCY, COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION and others
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA, INC. et al v. COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH et al
as 1:2011cv00630
Plaintiff:
CARLA CLEARY, C.N.M, LETITIA CLEMONS, DEJIONA JACKSON and others
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION, COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA STATE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, DIRECTOR OF THE INDIANA STATE BUDGET AGENCY and others
Amicu:
INDIANA GENERAL ASSEMBLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HOWELL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2010cv00981
Defendant:
JESSICA ALLEN, GREGORY BALLARD, CARL BRIZZI and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY E. HOWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITLOCK v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2010cv00802
Defendant:
EDWIN BUSS, MITCH DANIELS, BRUCE C. LEMMON and others
Plaintiff:
FLOYD E. WHITLOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2007cv00053
Plaintiff:
ERIC D. SMITH
Defendant:
MITCH DANIELS, J. DAVID DONAHUE, UNITED STATES CONGRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
