Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Thomas v. Obama et al
as 1:2013cv09292
Plaintiff:
Joshua Michael Thomas
Defendant:
Barrack Obama, George W. Bush Jr., Pat Quin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SRIVASTAVA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv01383
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, GERALD BEPKO, JAY BRAY and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Helen L. Owens v. George W. Bush, et al
as 11-2280
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HELEN L. OWENS
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE W. BUSH, former U.S. President, WAYNE R. ANDERSEN, U.S. District Judge, SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Dwayne Griffin v. George Bush, et al
as 09-4115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE GRIFFIN
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE W. BUSH, BARACK H. OBAMA, ROD R. BLAGOJEVICH and others
Dwayne Griffin v. George Bush
as 09-3974
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DWAYNE GRIFFIN
Defendant - Appellee:
GEORGE W. BUSH
Griffin v. Bush
as 3:2009cv03298
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Griffin
Defendant:
George W Bush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Bush et al
as 1:2009cv01366
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Griffin
Defendant:
George W Bush, Barack Obama, Rod R Blagojevich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Bush et al
as 1:2009cv01871
Plaintiff:
Kellie R Watson
Defendant:
George W Bush, Housing and Urban Development, Joseph P Galvan and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Vincent Rivera v. USA, et al
as 08-3695
Plaintiff - Appellant:
VINCENT F. RIVERA
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GEORGE W. BUSH, JEB BUSH and others
Freedom From Religion Foundation et al v. Bush et al
as 3:2008cv00588
Plaintiff:
Freedom From Religion Foundation, GAYLOR, ANNE NICOL, GAYLOR, ANNIE LAURIE and others
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Perino, James Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
