Cases 11 - 20 of 947
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Diggs v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01546
Plaintiff:
Glenn Diggs
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Christopher Parker, Derrick Martin Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
McKee v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00323
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Glenn McKee
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leslie v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
GLENN LESLIE
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
GLENN v. JAVELINA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
JASON GLENN
Defendant:
JAVELINA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
GLENN v. NISHIDA SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
KRISTA GLENN
Defendant:
NISHIDA SERVICES, INC. and HENRY M NISHIDA JR.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Eason v. Raoul et al
as 3:2023cv50462
Defendant:
AFSCME, Kwame Raoul, J. B. Pritzker and others
Plaintiff:
Hannibal Eason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RHODES v. MILLER-RHODES
as 1:2023cv02313
Plaintiff:
GLENN RHODES
Defendant:
MICHELLE MILLER-RHODES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jacobsen v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq04042
Plaintiff:
Glenn Jacobsen
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc and others
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
