Cases 11 - 20 of 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MCCLURE v. SMITH et al
as 2:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MCCLURE
Defendant:
NICK SMITH, KIM JENNINGS, MICHAEL GREGORY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
FRANCIS v. PLASSE et al
as 2:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
DONALD FRANCIS
Defendant:
JOHN PLASSE, CHARLEY FUNK, CASEY LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
ABRINA D. HARRISON
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Ritchie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
Harrison Ray Ritchie
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
REITER et al v. NOEL et al
as 4:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER REITER and TIFFANY NAPIER
Defendant:
JAMEY NOEL, DONOVAN HARRID, BRADLEY KRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRISON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv01888
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY S. HARRISON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
