Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Blevins v. US Marshal's Service et al
as 3:2010cv00230
Plaintiff:
Kevin J Blevins
Defendant:
US Marshal's Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLEVINS v. TURNER et al
as 1:2010cv00614
Plaintiff:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS
Defendant:
ESTEB, J. MALONE, MARION COUNTY JAIL and others
Official Capacity:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Blevins-Mamon v. Frank Anderson, et al
as 10-1449
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS-MAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK ANDERSON, MARION COUNTY JAIL, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Kevin Blevins-Mamon v. USA, et al
as 10-1416
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS-MAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Office of the United States Attorney, Hammond, IN and Indianapolis, IN, PETER SWAIM, US Marshal and K. FARIS, Inv. Research Spec.
Kevin Blevins v. Andrew Gottfried, et al
as 10-1244
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS-MAMON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANDREW GOTTFRIED and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Blevins v. O'Malley et al
as 1:2009cv00342
Plaintiff:
Kevin J Blevins
Defendant:
Thomas N O'Malley, Kelly Middleton and Northern District of Indiana Federal Community Defenders Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blevins v Gottfried et al
as 1:2009cv00343
Plaintiff:
Kevin J Blevins
Defendant:
Andrew Gottfried and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blevins v. USA
as 1:2009cv00304
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Kevin J Blevins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-3677
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
USA v. Kevin Blevins
as 08-4002
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
KEVIN J. BLEVINS-MAMON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
