Cases 11 - 20 of 379
Schenk v. Idelburg et al
as 1:2023cv16046
Plaintiff:
Benjamin M. Schenk
Defendant:
John D Idelburg, Charles Crockett, Walter Wittke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Puchner v. Severson et al
as 2:2023cv01523
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Eric Severson, Mike Maxwell, Hon Pepper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John Puchner v. Eric Severson
as 23-3153
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN D. PUCHNER
Respondent / Appellee:
ERIC J. SEVERSON
Puchner v. Severson et al
as 2:2023cv01335
Petitioner:
John D Puchner
Respondent:
Eric Severson, Waukesha County, Honorable Ludwig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
FARRIS D v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv01632
Plaintiff:
JOHN FARRIS D and JOHN D. FARRIS
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE and CHRISTINA REAGLR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gierczak v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv10244
Petitioner:
Mark A Gierczak
Respondent:
John D. Idleburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
John Puchner v. Eric Severson
as 23-2732
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN D. PUCHNER
Respondent / Appellee:
ERIC J. SEVERSON
Lewis v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv05353
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lewis
Defendant:
Sheriff John D. Idleburg, Chief Clouse, Deputy Chief Kalfas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Travers v. Idleburg et al
as 1:2023cv04816
Plaintiff:
Rishon Travers
Defendant:
John D. Idleburg, Jahaira Lopez, Aramark Commissary/Food Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore et al v. Rector
as 1:2023cv04514
Plaintiff:
Carolyn T. Moore and Stephanie A. Moore
Defendant:
John D. Rector
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
