Cases 11 - 20 of 31
McNairy v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv05127
Defendant:
E.A. RICHARDS, LAMONICA LEWIS, DEBRA KIRBY and others
Plaintiff:
ANDRE MCNAIRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Lopez v. City of Chicago, et al
as 17-2211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE LOPEZ, by his wife and next best friend, Sandra Cardiel
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, JOHN D. GUETTLER, JOSE VALDOVINOS and others
Lujano v. Matthews et al
as 1:2017cv03790
Plaintiff:
Adam A. Lujano
Defendant:
Haven Matthews, Kevin Kilroy, Daniel Delopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lopez v. Richardson et al
as 1:2016cv09670
Plaintiff:
Jose Lopez
Defendant:
Gregory A. Richardson, David Roark, Malethea Holmes-Okeawolman and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Brown v. Morsi et al
as 1:2015cv04127
Plaintiff:
Catherine Brown
Defendant:
Michelle Morsi, Jose Lopez, Jason Vanna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HERNANDEZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2015cv00093
Defendant:
ESTRADA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, H. A. RIOS, JR. and others
Plaintiff:
JOSE LOPEZ HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Harden v. Morsi, et al
as 1:2014cv06523
Defendant:
Michelle Morsi, City of Chicago and Jose Lopez
Plaintiff:
Vanesser Harden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carrillo v. 2624 South Central Park Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv02918
Plaintiff:
Armando Carrillo
Defendant:
2624 South Central Park Corporation, Jose Lopez and Maria Lopez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07348
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Guzman et al v. Village of Oak Lawn, Illinois et al
as 1:2013cv07027
Plaintiff:
Anthony Guzman and Jose Lopez
Defendant:
Village of Oak Lawn, Illinois , Sean Heilig , Michael McNeela and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
