Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Scott v. Jayco, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00901
Plaintiff:
Jacqie L. Scott, Kevin Scott and Kevin H Scott
Defendant:
Jayco Inc and Does 1 to 20
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Scott v. Avant, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv02561
Defendant:
Avant, LLC and Guardian Life Insurance
Plaintiff:
Roger L. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCOTT v. BERRYHILL
as 1:2018cv00715
Defendant:
NANCY A. BERRYHILL
Plaintiff:
SHONDA L. SCOTT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only) and SSA-USAO (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Rice et al v. Accord Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00936
Defendant:
Accord Healthcare, Inc. , Accord Healthcare, Ltd. , Sanofi U.S. Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Linda Rice , Robert Rice , Antoinette Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liu Wen Fang v. Russell S. Soehner, II, et al
as 16-1470
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIU WEN FANG
Defendant - Appellee:
RUSSELL SYLVAN SOEHNER, II, GARY L. SCOTT, JESSE HARMAN and others
Jordan et al v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01788
Plaintiff:
Paris Jordan and Joy L. Scott-Jordan
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc., AbbVie Products LLC, Abbott Laboratories and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Liu Wen Fang v. Soehner, Russell et al
as 3:2015cv00669
Plaintiff:
Liu Wen Fang
Defendant:
Russell Sylvan Soehner, II, Gary L. Scott, Jesse Harman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. COLVIN
as 1:2015cv00929
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
SHERRY L. SCOTT
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
SCOTT v. KNIGHT
as 1:2014cv02103
Respondent:
WENDY KNIGHT
Petitioner:
DANIEL L. SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 1:2014cv00394
Plaintiff:
Rodney L Scott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Miscellaneous_party:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
