Cases 11 - 20 of 55
MCCARTER v. BUTTS
as 1:2018cv00133
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANKLIN MCCARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCARTER v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv04395
Defendant:
KEITH BUTTS
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY FRANKLIN MCCARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrance McCarter v. USA
as 17-1925
Petitioner:
TERRANCE MCCARTER
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MCCARTER v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv01088
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JOHNNY F. MCCARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCARTER v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv01089
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JOHNNY F. MCCARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCARTER v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2017cv01006
Petitioner:
JOHNNY F. MCCARTER
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCCARTER v. BUTTS
as 1:2017cv00600
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JOHNNY F. MCCARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCarter v. AbbVie Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01063
Plaintiff:
Clyde McCarter
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc. , Abbott Laboratories, Inc. , AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Illinois Liberty PAC, et al v. Lisa Madigan, et al
as 16-3585
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ILLINOIS LIBERTY PAC, Political Action Committee registered with the Illinois State Board of Elections, EDGAR BACHRACH and KYLE MCCARTER
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA MADIGAN, Attorney General of the State of Illinois, WILLIAM MCGUFFAGE, Chairman of the Illinois State Board of Elections, JESSE R. SMART, Vice-Chairman of the Illinois State Board of Elections and others
United States of America v. McCarter
as 1:2016cv06676
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Terrance McCarter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
